11 Comments
Jan 30Liked by Warner Mendenhall

Get rid of the 1986 act and you will see the traditional program come down. 70 plus dosages through 18 of traditional is not safe for any child.

Expand full comment
Jan 30Liked by Warner Mendenhall

I just want to say thank you for your dedication and your integrity in these difficult fights! I can only hope that, should I ever need one, I’d be able to find an attorney like you wherever I am. Saying and sending prayers for you and your team!

Expand full comment

I'm hoping that's also true for that new ICD code which isn't actually a "diagnosis" and if they deem it one, then it's discrimination. If disparate treatment results from either, it's active discrimination.

Expand full comment

My understanding is that CDC may have changed their definition of vaccine on their website, but it has not changed with respect to the law? Is that correct?

Expand full comment

Though not exhaustive, I wrote this post to list questions parents should be asking with respect to any drug or medical treatment for their child:

https://leemuller.substack.com/p/are-you-a-risk-taker

Expand full comment

Thank you.

Expand full comment

Thank you very much for covering this issue! It's an unbelievably difficult problem. Also when the under 18 year old minor doesn't want to get the new experimental injections but the other party with joint legal custody forces it on the minor and the other parent ( the courts automatically give out joint legal custody with no evidence the other party is safe to be around a child) What should the other parent do AFTER the other party deliberately makes the minor take the injections against their will and the free clinics won't listen to the minor? Also the other party using these experimental injections to abuse the minor?

Expand full comment