6 Comments

Except informally they did say it would stop transmission.

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/yes-pfizer-marketed-the-vaccines

Expand full comment
Oct 17, 2022·edited Oct 17, 2022

Nor was this old news from 2013 Never disclosed.. 3:30 long...Man who was in the 2013 mRNA trials says over 200K people died testing mRNA Injections. And only 5 survived the trials. In a 2013 trial of over 200,000 people testing MRNA-based medication. All of them had their hearts stop. https://www.bitchute.com/video/tAHGWGxAYXCr/

Expand full comment

Right from the very start, back in December 2020 when these inoculations came out, the drug companies said the vaccines will not prevent infections and they will not prevent transmission.

Expand full comment
deletedOct 17, 2022·edited Oct 17, 2022Liked by Warner Mendenhall
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

ROTHSCHILD jews INVENTED THE CCP AND ISRAEL EPSTEIN WROTE THERE LITTLE RED BOOK ALL THEY HAD TO DO IS COPY THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO WHICH THEY HIRED AND INSTRUCTED MARX/ENGEL TO WRITE... YOUR SELLING A BOOK...I AM NOT...1848: Karl Marx, an Ashkenazi Jew, publishes, "The Communist Manifesto." Interestingly at the same time as he is working on this, Karl Ritter of Frankfurt University was writing the antithesis which would form the basis for Freidrich Wilhelm Nietzsche's, "Nietzscheanism." This Nietzecheanism was later developed into Fascism and then into Nazism and was used to forment the first and second world wars. Marx, Ritter, and Nietzsche were all funded and under the instruction of the Rothschilds. The idea was that those who direct the overall conspiracy could use the differences in those two so-called ideologies to enable them to divide larger and larger factions of the human race into opposing camps so that they could be armed and then brainwashed into fighting and destroying each other, and particularly, to destroy all political and religious institutions. The same plan put forward by Weishaupt in 1776.

THE TRUTH WILL ALWAYS REMAIN FREE...The History Of The House Of Rothschild

TIMELINE By Andrew Hitchcock https://rense.com/general88/hist.htm

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

LIKE ALL THE VOTERS THAT VOTED WHILE UNDER LOCKDOWN MANDATES EO ON MARCH 13TH 2020...I WONDER WHAT THE FOUNDERS WOULD DO? LETS BUILD VOTING CENTERS AND GRAB SOME PIZZA AFTERWARD? I DONT NEED A BOOK TO KNOW WHO STARTED ALL THOSE ISMs =IM SEEKING MISERY... NOW DO I... Paul Harvey - Our Lives, Our Fortunes and our Sacred Honor https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVJkUxwWF2o&t=285s

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

cause you are promoting the book in this group Not yelling hands were in a lot of pain that day your pushing the Drumph his real name wuhan narrative... what you going to do about the sport suggest another book...btw galaxosmithkline owns half the wuhan lab and pfizer controls gsk... any suggestions on this and remember you can get drumphs warp speed clot shot jab via skin shedding...SCOTUS Decision 2013 -Pathology vs Myriad Genetics- SCOTUS ruled the 'injection' is now technically 'patented'. 3-MINUTE VIDEO https://www.bitchute.com/video/HTWM3WrfqJqq/ NOW YOU ARE IN A NEW CATEGORY THAT DOES NOT HAVE HUMAN RIGHTS...In a Supreme Court case decision in 2013 - Pathology vs Myriad Genetics, Inc - the United States Supreme Court ruled that you cannot patent human DNA as it is 'a product of nature'. However, at the end of the ruling, the Supreme Court supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf wrote that if you were to change a human's genome by mRNA injections (being used currently) then the (altered) genome Can be patented. This means that everyone who has had the 'injection' is now technically 'patented'. Anything that is patented is 'owned' and comes under the definition of 'trans human'. Therefore, technically, anyone having this 'injection' can no longer have any access to Human Rights. There have been a few legal papers discussing this recently, so there should be clarification on this soon. As of now, the high court ruling stands NOW YOU ARE IN A NEW CATEGORY THAT DOES NOT HAVE HUMAN RIGHTS...In a Supreme Court case decision in 2013 - Pathology vs Myriad Genetics, Inc - the United States Supreme Court ruled that you cannot patent human DNA as it is 'a product of nature'. However, at the end of the ruling, the Supreme Court supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf wrote that if you were to change a human's genome by mRNA injections (being used currently) then the (altered) genome Can be patented. This means that everyone who has had the 'injection' is now technically 'patented'. Anything that is patented is 'owned' and comes under the definition of 'trans human'. Therefore, technically, anyone having this 'injection' can no longer have any access to Human Rights. There have been a few legal papers discussing this recently, so there should be clarification on this soon. As of now, the high court ruling stands

Expand full comment