Yes, they are! They blame Covid, climate change, and SADS, even though it's illogical! “Climate change” couldn't (I mean come on), Covid has been around since 2020 and SADS was pretty rare!
My grandma told me that when measles shot first came out she was happy all her kids had measles already. The shot being brand new and all. Similar things were being said initially. Many were hesitant. She said suddenly baby's started dying in their sleep & suddenly SIDS was a thing. Now my generation had no idea that's how SIDS came about and believed a baby could just die in it's sleep without cause. Not ever thinking a shot could have been the cause. We know better now! SADS is same. It existed previously but very few people were diagnosed. Now, they are normalizing youth and young adults dying with it. In a few generations, it'll just be accepted. That's how this works unless we break through the fog and deceit!
SIDS-Came about shortly after brand-new jabs
SADS-Came about shortly after brand new jabs. SIDS and now SADS are a cover for jab injury!
How can people not be bothered by the noticeable increase in young dying and believe the jab which is the ONLY new thing in 2021 isn't the cause be snapped out of it??
THANKS... SCOTUS Decision 2013 -Pathology vs Myriad Genetics- SCOTUS ruled the 'injection' is now technically 'patented'. 3-MINUTE VIDEO https://www.bitchute.com/video/HTWM3WrfqJqq/ NOW YOU ARE IN A NEW CATEGORY THAT DOES NOT HAVE HUMAN RIGHTS...In a Supreme Court case decision in 2013 - Pathology vs Myriad Genetics, Inc - the United States Supreme Court ruled that you cannot patent human DNA as it is 'a product of nature'. However, at the end of the ruling, the Supreme Court supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf wrote that if you were to change a human's genome by mRNA injections (being used currently) then the (altered) genome Can be patented. This means that everyone who has had the 'injection' is now technically 'patented'. Anything that is patented is 'owned' and comes under the definition of 'trans human'. Therefore, technically, anyone having this 'injection' can no longer have any access to Human Rights. There have been a few legal papers discussing this recently, so there should be clarification on this soon. As of now, the high court ruling stands NOW YOU ARE IN A NEW CATEGORY THAT DOES NOT HAVE HUMAN RIGHTS...In a Supreme Court case decision in 2013 - Pathology vs Myriad Genetics, Inc - the United States Supreme Court ruled that you cannot patent human DNA as it is 'a product of nature'. However, at the end of the ruling, the Supreme Court supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf wrote that if you were to change a human's genome by mRNA injections (being used currently) then the (altered) genome Can be patented. This means that everyone who has had the 'injection' is now technically 'patented'. Anything that is patented is 'owned' and comes under the definition of 'trans human'. Therefore, technically, anyone having this 'injection' can no longer have any access to Human Rights. There have been a few legal papers discussing this recently, so there should be clarification on this soon. As of now, the high court ruling stands
THANKS... SCOTUS Decision 2013 -Pathology vs Myriad Genetics- SCOTUS ruled the 'injection' is now technically 'patented'. 3-MINUTE VIDEO https://www.bitchute.com/video/HTWM3WrfqJqq/ NOW YOU ARE IN A NEW CATEGORY THAT DOES NOT HAVE HUMAN RIGHTS...In a Supreme Court case decision in 2013 - Pathology vs Myriad Genetics, Inc - the United States Supreme Court ruled that you cannot patent human DNA as it is 'a product of nature'. However, at the end of the ruling, the Supreme Court supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf wrote that if you were to change a human's genome by mRNA injections (being used currently) then the (altered) genome Can be patented. This means that everyone who has had the 'injection' is now technically 'patented'. Anything that is patented is 'owned' and comes under the definition of 'trans human'. Therefore, technically, anyone having this 'injection' can no longer have any access to Human Rights. There have been a few legal papers discussing this recently, so there should be clarification on this soon. As of now, the high court ruling stands NOW YOU ARE IN A NEW CATEGORY THAT DOES NOT HAVE HUMAN RIGHTS...In a Supreme Court case decision in 2013 - Pathology vs Myriad Genetics, Inc - the United States Supreme Court ruled that you cannot patent human DNA as it is 'a product of nature'. However, at the end of the ruling, the Supreme Court supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf wrote that if you were to change a human's genome by mRNA injections (being used currently) then the (altered) genome Can be patented. This means that everyone who has had the 'injection' is now technically 'patented'. Anything that is patented is 'owned' and comes under the definition of 'trans human'. Therefore, technically, anyone having this 'injection' can no longer have any access to Human Rights. There have been a few legal papers discussing this recently, so there should be clarification on this soon. As of now, the high court ruling stands
UNDER 11 MINUTES I SUGGEST YOU SEE FOR YOURSELF WHERE THE TOP FEMA MAN THANKS DRUMPH FOR EMPOWERING FEMA...
FEMA list of Presidential Executive Orders International Emergency Economic Powers Act Enables the President to seize the property of a foreign country or nation. These powers were transferred to FEMA in a sweeping consolidation in 1979. Executive Order #10990: Allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports. Executive Order #10995: Seizure of all communications media in the United States. Executive Order #10997: Seizure of all electric power fuels and minerals, public and private. Executive Order #10998: Allows the government to seize all means of transportation, including personal cars, trucks or vehicles of any kind and total control over all highways, seaports, and waterways. Executive Order #10999: Seizure of all means of transportation, including personal cars, trucks or vehicles of any kind and total control of highways, seaports and waterways. Executive Order #11000: Seizure of all American people for work forces under federal supervision including the splitting of families if the government finds it necessary. Executive Order #11001: Seizure of all health, education and welfare facilities, public and private. Executive Order #11002: Empowered the postmaster general to register all men, women and children in the U.S. Executive Order #11003: Seizure of all airports and aircraft.Executive Order #11004: Seizure of all housing and finance authorities to establish Forced Relocation Designated areas to be abandoned as "unsafe." Executive Order #11005: Seizure of all railroads, inland waterways and storage facilities, public and private. Executive Order #12919: Signed June 3, 1994, by President Clinton. Encompasses all the above executive orders.National Security Act of 1947Allows for the strategic relocation of industries, services, government and other essential economic activities, and to rationalize the requirements for manpower, resources and production facilities. 1950 Defense Production Act Gives the President sweeping powers over all aspects of the economy. https://www.bitchute.com/video/s2A1A775WCTf/
Yes, they are! They blame Covid, climate change, and SADS, even though it's illogical! “Climate change” couldn't (I mean come on), Covid has been around since 2020 and SADS was pretty rare!
My grandma told me that when measles shot first came out she was happy all her kids had measles already. The shot being brand new and all. Similar things were being said initially. Many were hesitant. She said suddenly baby's started dying in their sleep & suddenly SIDS was a thing. Now my generation had no idea that's how SIDS came about and believed a baby could just die in it's sleep without cause. Not ever thinking a shot could have been the cause. We know better now! SADS is same. It existed previously but very few people were diagnosed. Now, they are normalizing youth and young adults dying with it. In a few generations, it'll just be accepted. That's how this works unless we break through the fog and deceit!
SIDS-Came about shortly after brand-new jabs
SADS-Came about shortly after brand new jabs. SIDS and now SADS are a cover for jab injury!
How can people not be bothered by the noticeable increase in young dying and believe the jab which is the ONLY new thing in 2021 isn't the cause be snapped out of it??
THANKS... SCOTUS Decision 2013 -Pathology vs Myriad Genetics- SCOTUS ruled the 'injection' is now technically 'patented'. 3-MINUTE VIDEO https://www.bitchute.com/video/HTWM3WrfqJqq/ NOW YOU ARE IN A NEW CATEGORY THAT DOES NOT HAVE HUMAN RIGHTS...In a Supreme Court case decision in 2013 - Pathology vs Myriad Genetics, Inc - the United States Supreme Court ruled that you cannot patent human DNA as it is 'a product of nature'. However, at the end of the ruling, the Supreme Court supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf wrote that if you were to change a human's genome by mRNA injections (being used currently) then the (altered) genome Can be patented. This means that everyone who has had the 'injection' is now technically 'patented'. Anything that is patented is 'owned' and comes under the definition of 'trans human'. Therefore, technically, anyone having this 'injection' can no longer have any access to Human Rights. There have been a few legal papers discussing this recently, so there should be clarification on this soon. As of now, the high court ruling stands NOW YOU ARE IN A NEW CATEGORY THAT DOES NOT HAVE HUMAN RIGHTS...In a Supreme Court case decision in 2013 - Pathology vs Myriad Genetics, Inc - the United States Supreme Court ruled that you cannot patent human DNA as it is 'a product of nature'. However, at the end of the ruling, the Supreme Court supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf wrote that if you were to change a human's genome by mRNA injections (being used currently) then the (altered) genome Can be patented. This means that everyone who has had the 'injection' is now technically 'patented'. Anything that is patented is 'owned' and comes under the definition of 'trans human'. Therefore, technically, anyone having this 'injection' can no longer have any access to Human Rights. There have been a few legal papers discussing this recently, so there should be clarification on this soon. As of now, the high court ruling stands
Thanks for mentioning this! It is awfully suspicious, isn't it? I'm sure there must be some other explanation....like climate change =)
THANKS... SCOTUS Decision 2013 -Pathology vs Myriad Genetics- SCOTUS ruled the 'injection' is now technically 'patented'. 3-MINUTE VIDEO https://www.bitchute.com/video/HTWM3WrfqJqq/ NOW YOU ARE IN A NEW CATEGORY THAT DOES NOT HAVE HUMAN RIGHTS...In a Supreme Court case decision in 2013 - Pathology vs Myriad Genetics, Inc - the United States Supreme Court ruled that you cannot patent human DNA as it is 'a product of nature'. However, at the end of the ruling, the Supreme Court supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf wrote that if you were to change a human's genome by mRNA injections (being used currently) then the (altered) genome Can be patented. This means that everyone who has had the 'injection' is now technically 'patented'. Anything that is patented is 'owned' and comes under the definition of 'trans human'. Therefore, technically, anyone having this 'injection' can no longer have any access to Human Rights. There have been a few legal papers discussing this recently, so there should be clarification on this soon. As of now, the high court ruling stands NOW YOU ARE IN A NEW CATEGORY THAT DOES NOT HAVE HUMAN RIGHTS...In a Supreme Court case decision in 2013 - Pathology vs Myriad Genetics, Inc - the United States Supreme Court ruled that you cannot patent human DNA as it is 'a product of nature'. However, at the end of the ruling, the Supreme Court supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf wrote that if you were to change a human's genome by mRNA injections (being used currently) then the (altered) genome Can be patented. This means that everyone who has had the 'injection' is now technically 'patented'. Anything that is patented is 'owned' and comes under the definition of 'trans human'. Therefore, technically, anyone having this 'injection' can no longer have any access to Human Rights. There have been a few legal papers discussing this recently, so there should be clarification on this soon. As of now, the high court ruling stands
UNDER 11 MINUTES I SUGGEST YOU SEE FOR YOURSELF WHERE THE TOP FEMA MAN THANKS DRUMPH FOR EMPOWERING FEMA...
FEMA list of Presidential Executive Orders International Emergency Economic Powers Act Enables the President to seize the property of a foreign country or nation. These powers were transferred to FEMA in a sweeping consolidation in 1979. Executive Order #10990: Allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports. Executive Order #10995: Seizure of all communications media in the United States. Executive Order #10997: Seizure of all electric power fuels and minerals, public and private. Executive Order #10998: Allows the government to seize all means of transportation, including personal cars, trucks or vehicles of any kind and total control over all highways, seaports, and waterways. Executive Order #10999: Seizure of all means of transportation, including personal cars, trucks or vehicles of any kind and total control of highways, seaports and waterways. Executive Order #11000: Seizure of all American people for work forces under federal supervision including the splitting of families if the government finds it necessary. Executive Order #11001: Seizure of all health, education and welfare facilities, public and private. Executive Order #11002: Empowered the postmaster general to register all men, women and children in the U.S. Executive Order #11003: Seizure of all airports and aircraft.Executive Order #11004: Seizure of all housing and finance authorities to establish Forced Relocation Designated areas to be abandoned as "unsafe." Executive Order #11005: Seizure of all railroads, inland waterways and storage facilities, public and private. Executive Order #12919: Signed June 3, 1994, by President Clinton. Encompasses all the above executive orders.National Security Act of 1947Allows for the strategic relocation of industries, services, government and other essential economic activities, and to rationalize the requirements for manpower, resources and production facilities. 1950 Defense Production Act Gives the President sweeping powers over all aspects of the economy. https://www.bitchute.com/video/s2A1A775WCTf/