The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19 (Figure 2).
Yet, this study claims the bivalent “vaccine” booster provides 30% protection. There is no risk benefit analysis of the “protection” from Covid v. the risk of adverse reactions from the “vaccine” in the short and long-term.
With this kind of information why are many academic institutions still requiring the shots? We should not send our children to places where the leaders are so stupid.
The study is here. I wonder if they are going to have to have a release explaining this evidence and continuing to recommend the shots like they have done in the past.
A CCF prior study on natural immunity is here. That study showed no employees with confirmed positive Covid tests who remained unvaccinated were re-infected. They put out an explanatory release that continued to recommend all get the shot here.
Here is why. https://open.substack.com/pub/coffeeandcovid/p/the-wrong-antibody-monday-december?r=2ru67&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
We live in clownworld now.