Discover more from CovidLawCast.Com
For Californians, “experiment” includes investigational new drugs (INDs) and the Nuremburg principles should apply. All initial COVID19 “vaccines” were INDs so this vast experiment should have provided strong protection for the people of California. It is astounding that this statute has been so completely overlooked in that state:
California Code, Health and Safety Code - HSC § 24171: The Legislature hereby finds and declares that medical experimentation on human subjects is vital for the benefit of mankind, however such experimentation shall be undertaken with due respect to the preciousness of human life and the right of individuals to determine what is done to their own bodies. The Legislature further finds and declares that: (a) The Nuremberg Code of Ethics in Medical Research was developed after the trial of Nazi war criminals for unethical use of persons in medical experiments; subsequently, the Declaration of Helsinki additionally established recommendations guiding doctors in experimentation involving human subjects.
(b) Neither the Nuremberg Code nor the Declaration of Helsinki are codified under law and are, therefore, unenforceable.
(c) It is necessary that medical experimentation be done in such a way as to protect the rights of the human subjects involved.
(d) There is, and will continue to be, a growing need for protection for citizens of the state from unauthorized, needless, hazardous, or negligently performed medical experiments on human beings.
It is, therefore, the intent of the Legislature, in the enacting of this chapter, to provide minimum statutory protection for the citizens of this state with regard to human experimentation and to provide penalties for those who violate such provisions.
California’s codification of Nuremburg is as follows:
As used in the chapter, “experimental subject's bill of rights,” means a list of the rights of a subject in a medical experiment, written in a language in which the subject is fluent. Except as otherwise provided in Section 24175, this list shall include, but not be limited to the subject's right to:
(a) Be informed of the nature and purpose of the experiment.
(b) Be given an explanation of the procedures to be followed in the medical experiment, and any drug or device to be utilized.
(c) Be given a description of any attendant discomforts and risks reasonably to be expected from the experiment.
(d) Be given an explanation of any benefits to the subject reasonably to be expected from the experiment, if applicable.
(e) Be given a disclosure of any appropriate alternative procedures, drugs or devices that might be advantageous to the subject, and their relative risks and benefits.
(f) Be informed of the avenues of medical treatment, if any, available to the subject after the experiment if complications should arise.
(g) Be given an opportunity to ask any questions concerning the experiment or the procedures involved.
(h) Be instructed that consent to participate in the medical experiment may be withdrawn at any time and the subject may discontinue participation in the medical experiment without prejudice.
(i) Be given a copy of the signed and dated written consent form as provided for by Section 24173 or 24178.
(j) Be given the opportunity to decide to consent or not to consent to a medical experiment without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, coercion, or undue influence on the subject's decision.
Additionally, Section 111550 of the California Health and Safety Code provides that "No person shall sell, deliver, or give away any new drug" that lacks FDA approval unless the State of California has approved the new drug under Health and Safety Code Section 111550(b). The COVID-19 vaccines are EUA products not fully licensed and approved by the FDA. As far as I can tell CA has never “approved” the EUA drugs.
As long as you are using an EUA product you are part of the experiment. Population level research is ongoing and data is being reported to the local, state, and federal governments.
Nuremburg Code
The answer to this Global attack on humanity has ALWAYS been local action and local control. This murderous campaign has its Genesis in the DOD which has been captured by the Globalista Billionaire class. We must take back our G-D given rights at the local, county and State levels just as our founders would have done. We must then tear down the criminal leviathan of DC by defunding about 75% of everything. That means everything unconstitutional at a minimum. And we must prosecute every scumbag and his brother to the fullest extent of the law who had anything to do with promoting this thoroughly antihuman debacle. HANG THEM PUBLICLY!!
Warner, thank you for this. It is my opinion and belief that the state laws are being overlooked. As an example, in my southern state: living will statute - clear public policy of the state that persons make their own medical decisions, including right to deny lifesaving medical treatment; patient bill of rights; informed consent law; right of conscience law (abortion) that denies adverse employment action for Healthcare provider refusing to perform abortion; legislative action overturned our state's equivalent to Buck v Bell in the 2000s, including state paid reparations. Nursing home employee/resident flu vaccine mandate - exemptions include religious, medical and right to say no if refusing on basis of informed consent. I will now look for the equivalent to this in my state. God's will be done. Thank you for all you do.