Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Noelle S (Jennifer Incognito)'s avatar

Exactly my thought when I read this statement this morning, which called to mind Thurgood Marshall's dissent in Skinner:

"History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure. The World War II relocation-camp cases, Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81, 63 S.Ct. 1375, 87 L.Ed. 1774 (1943); Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214, 65 S.Ct. 193, 89 L.Ed. 194 (1944), and the Red scare and McCarthy-era internal subversion cases, Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47, 39 S.Ct. 247, 63 L.Ed. 470 (1919); Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494, 71 S.Ct. 857, 95 L.Ed. 1137 (1951), are only the most extreme reminders that when we allow fundamental freedoms to be sacrificed in the name of real or perceived exigency, we invariably come to regret it." Thurgood Marshall in Skinner v Railway Labor Executives Association.

Expand full comment
Ernie Rockwell's avatar

About time we had some strong words against the overreach by SCOTUS. Good luck with your suits.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts