Australian Government Sued over "vaccine" mandate.
This will be a case to watch.
The Complaint is a good reference document for anyone to quickly find studies and statistics, a review of the lies told to all of us, and the injuries sustained by victims. It outlines the Australian Government’s mis, mal, and non-feasance related to the Covid crisis and “vaccine” rollout.
Doctor Melissa McCann explains the class action lawsuit and her involvement here.
To read the 652 pages of allegations go here.
The Pfizer Clinical Trial by the numbers starts on page 152 and goes as follows:
There in fact were 43,448 participants wherein:
21,720 were in the Pfizer Vaccine group;
21,728 were in the placebo group;
Of that number only 170 subjects tested positive for Covid and developed mild or greater Covid symptoms during the trial period, being the defined confirmed cases endpoint for the study determined by Pfizer and known to the Respondents;
Of the “confirmed Covid cases”:
8 were reported in the Pfizer Vaccine group;
162 were reported in the placebo group;
Clinical efficacy of 95% was erroneously concluded and determined by applying these two relative numbers to each other as follows:
comparing 8/170 for the Pfizer Vaccine group and 162/170 in the
inferring from that the Pfizer Vaccine was shown to be 95% effective;
Wherein in fact:
99.07% of the unvaccinated group in the Pfizer Clinical Trial did not
develop symptomatic Covid infection;
99.95% the Pfizer Vaccine group in the Pfizer Clinical Trial did not develop symptomatic Covid infection;
there was scientifically demonstrated and disclosed: (1) an absolute risk reduction of symptomatic Covid infection of only 0.71% in the Pfizer Vaccine group; (2) the number of doses of Pfizer Vaccine needed to treat, being the number of doses needed to prevent a single case of symptomatic Covid infection, of 141 doses.
I recently filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division (Leathers, et. al v. United States of America, et al.; Case No.: 1:23-cv-175) that challenges the U.S. government response to COVID-19 as violating the 14th Amend. Liberty Clause (overriding/vitiating informed consent to treatment and bodily integrity through "vaccine" mandates and depriving patients of the choice to treat with ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine) and the 1st Amend. right to free speech (banning/suppression of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, censorship of speech on social media and print and broadcast media.) The lawsuit also challenges the FDA's damning of ivermectin as ultra vires under the APA. It also addresses the fraud and manipulation of data in the Pfizer clinical trial and post-authorization marketing experience. It is 173 pages long with over 300 footnotes and every allegation of scientific fact is sourced. The lawsuit seeks to enjoin the U.S. government to correct its false guidance regarding the "vaccines," stop false advertisements that portray the "vaccines" as "safe and effective" without appropriate disclaimers, caveats or warnings, stop advertising altogether that is directed to children, and remove the COVID-19 "vaccine" from the Childhood Immunization Schedule, among other things. I would be happy to provide a copy of the complaint to anyone who is interested. You may email me at firstname.lastname@example.org.
That infinitesimally tiny absolute risk reduction, and the corporate and political world demanded jabs mandates??? That tells you that any individual’s personal health was completely disregarded for a global agenda.