72 Comments
User's avatar
Bill's avatar

I am assuming a counter measure is countering in this case a disease, so basically since COVID-19 was not really the disease these poison bioweapons were made for, only used as a pretense.. Can I assume that we are the disease these counter measure poison bio weapons were made for??????

Expand full comment
Mike B's avatar

These countermeasures are aimed at mankind. We are the carbon they really want to reduce drastically. When their bioweapon fails to do the job – uptake has slowed to a trickle almost everywhere and only the most brainwashed still roll up their sleeves – they will probably trigger nuclear annihilation by Russia to achieve their culling quota. I DO hope I’m utterly wrong but with the current crop of corrupt cretins at the helm all over the West everything is possible.

Expand full comment
Bill's avatar

You are correct, I have mentioned that before.. We are the carbon footprint and emissions they want to reduce.. They always use code words, so you have to analyze everything said.. Like we have said this BS is worldwide, so its not just the West unfortunately.. This is a well organized global operation, with a TON of MINIONS who are disposable, but do not know it..

Expand full comment
Mike B's avatar

Yep, I don’t trust any of those ā€œglobal elitesā€. What I wanted to say is that the West has really just a bunch of imbeciles – Biden and his neocon cabal, Turdeau, Ardern, Sunak, Macron, Scholz et al. in Germany (they’re straight from the bottom of the barrel), Stoltenberg etc. – running the show. They are commandeered of course by the real PTB, whereas Russia’s and China’s leadership is ruthless and top notch. So it doesn’t really look good at all for us in the globalist infested West.

Expand full comment
Bill's avatar

I would have to agree with you.. As you probably know the West is the Muscle or Military, so no brains wanted or needed LOL, London is Finance, and the Vatican is the religion, unfortunately not a religion we would worship, but it is the ELITES...

Expand full comment
Free Human's avatar

And one wonders where the entity directing each of these 3 "fulfillment layers" calls home - Geneva (Octagon), Venice (Black Nobility), or maybe go straight to the top - off planet....

Expand full comment
John H.'s avatar

The off-planet director is clearly Satan. The question for the world is: has the prophesied antichrist already assumed terrestrial control but not yet been publicly introduced on the world stage? For those who study biblical prophecy and reject the false Rapture doctrine of Scofield, that would be the next development to watch for. The Beast System of Revelation 13:16-17 appears to be set for full implementation through the CBDC/internal digital ID/social credit score system.

Expand full comment
Stevanovitch's avatar

Any nuke will be from the evil NATO bunch; Putin doesn’t do Desperate, doesn’t need to.

Expand full comment
SaHiB's avatar

Bingo, Dr. Malthus!

Expand full comment
Stevanovitch's avatar

I can see a movie title coming... ā€œ Countermeasureā€ starring, well, you know WHO.

Expand full comment
Bill's avatar

LOL...

Expand full comment
Just a Clinician's avatar

Does poison cause disease?

Just because it may not be an infectious disease does not mean it's not a disease.

Expand full comment
DRK's avatar

Since 'disease' is medically defined as "An interruption, cessation, or disorder of a body, system, or organ structure or function", yes. Medically speaking, even a broken bone is a 'disease'. Poison would definitely cause disease - in spite of the fact that the public thinks of disease being contagious, or at least infectious (not the same thing).

Expand full comment
Laura Kasner's avatar

Warner - glad to see that you are calling these death shots ā€œcountermeasuresā€. I hear from Sasha Latypova that you are friends. God bless you.

Expand full comment
DRK's avatar

The federal government calls the COVID-19 shots 'countermeasures' - hence the "Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program" set up specifically for the injections deceptively marketed as "vaccines", instead of the National Vaccine Injury Program set up year ago for injury claims from all other vaccines. Though the contract the DoD had with Pfizer was reportedly written for the delivery of "vaccines effective against COVID-19" - which is also odd, since COVID -19 is a syndrome, a set of (undistinguished) symptoms attributed to a virus called SARS-CoV 2.

Expand full comment
Sasha Latypova's avatar

Great approach, Warner! Hoaxers made hoaxing about the hoax illegal - I wonder if they realized what they were doing by issuing this Act?

Expand full comment
JWM_IN_VA's avatar

So it appears Robert Barnes is downplayng the DoD angle. He's saying that there is confusion and DoD doesn't "own the vaxx" and that Pfizer owns the patents. Now the thing is the contracts are issued by DoD so the end products is owned by it. I think the two are mutualy exclusive. Disappointed in him a bit over this.

Expand full comment
Sasha Latypova's avatar

Parents only determine the exclusivity. The real ownership is complex issue, but it's less important than who actually controls the product in the supply chain.

Expand full comment
Tom's avatar

Yeah I watched the vivafrei video at 1.32.52 he starts talking about it but ignors Sasha's work on this. He talks about holding to account the people at these institutions. But will they include the companies behind Pfizer who actually made the "vaccines" or should I say prototype for a demonstration. Sasha has named these companies. Are they going to go after those people as well I wonder ?

Expand full comment
JWM_IN_VA's avatar

The mild ad hominem at the beginning is what bothers me. I am going to listen again and post something at his locals channel. He reads my posts for sure and knows my screenname. No one is suggesting to not pursue big pharma. However, the mrna vaxx mfg capacity now exists at these CBRNE mfrs captive to the dod. If Pfizer goes down, SO WHAT?! The capacity exists to do it again. He'll Malone has talked about this.

Expand full comment
Sasha Latypova's avatar

Exactly! The oldest game in the book is for the government to commit atrocity, then pretend big bad business did it and offload all prosecution on a corporation (where no individual is held responsible, only corporation). This is how it goes:

1.Plan the atrocity for years, set up a network/infrastructure to implement it (print money, give it to a bunch of corps for BS project for years, so they are entirely dependent and at beck and call).

2. Take equity positions through private funds in said corporations prior to the "go" signal on the atrocity. Ride the market and make money off the stock.

3. When it starts unraveling, sell all holdings.

4. Call for investigations into the corporate misbehavior and look like a crusading politician.

5. 10-15 years of investigations feeding and army of your lobbying lawyers. Find the corp guilty of a felony, corp pays mega fine to the government, pleads guilty through a shell subsidiary, and continues as nothing happened.

Result: atrocity committed flawlessly. Politicians and their corporate co-conspirators are privately wealthy through stock trades on the way up an down, and the government offices got extra budget through corporate fines, and now they have the corporation completely in cahoots and willing to do the next atrocity.

Expand full comment
JWM_IN_VA's avatar

So here is where this notion is coming from https://covidreason.substack.com/p/did-national-security-imperatives

I dont find that article convincing. Barnes is saying it's either Dod or pharma. I don't understand the mutual exclusion. I sense they're afraid of "BioWeapons".

Expand full comment
JWM_IN_VA's avatar

Here's what I posted in response: Not finding that article on the Dod involvement at all convincing Robert. Why is it mutually exclusive? It shouldn't be. You need to realize that the CBRNE MIC contractors are subbed to Pfizer. They will continue to be captive to the MIC regardless of what happens to Pfizer and that mfg capacity WILL STILL BE THERE.

The MIC now funds 50% of pharma R and D. It's been captured by the MIC effectively. It's not going away unless it's reigned in.

Expand full comment
Sasha Latypova's avatar

I don't understand why he doesn't think it's possible for a government to merge with private corporations. I mean is he familiar with UN, WEF, WHO, Public-private partnerships, DOD Consortia, BARDA feeding 50% of pharma R&D spend annually, "Trusted news initiative", government feeding money to every university, hospital, school, non-profit etc etc. to push "safe and effective" poison? I can go on listing examples of this 100% pure, very potent, unadulterated, industrial-grade fascism for hours!!!

Expand full comment
Tom's avatar

But isn't it beyond the govt. Living in the UK I get the total sense we do not have a govt it's just a puppet situation and if they don't do as told they are out or trashed. Are we not talking about the banksters...

Expand full comment
JWM_IN_VA's avatar

The government is supposed to be a representative its constituents not an entity on to self. However, to your point of i.t being subverted that is certainly possible if not probable. That doesn't change the math though. We outnumber them easily and in the US we're armed so it's not thst simple here.

Expand full comment
Sasha Latypova's avatar

Correct. There are no "governments" in a sense of representative democratically elected legislation/executive/judicial. What we have instead is "idiocracy" (watch the movie if you haven't) where large corps and private interest masquerade as elected government which are never in fact elected, and have no accountability to the electorate anyway. They write illegal laws and then proceed to genocide with impunity.

Expand full comment
JWM_IN_VA's avatar

Someone tell me if I'm off-base here?

Expand full comment
Edward Bernaysauce's avatar

...every trick in the book.

Expand full comment
SeeingTruth's avatar

What a convient way to support the narrative - this act is coercive in its own right

Expand full comment
Andy Bunting's avatar

Another chink in their supposedly impenetrable legal fraudulent armour, they set up.

Most excellent news indeed.

Expand full comment
Warren Ross's avatar

We need a win

Expand full comment
Geoff Wexler's avatar

Countersue utilizing my agency Warner, it's rather pertinent as I'm sitting on the clearest case in the world and was referred your way.

https://rumble.com/v24ahme-live-rumble-exclusive-premiere-of-new-video-metabiota-and-hunter-biden-spec.html

Expand full comment
Andy Bunting's avatar

Thank you Sir for the link.

Hoping that your legal agency can bring this to justice.

Expand full comment
Geoff Wexler's avatar

It's gonna take someone who isn't controlled opposition; possibly licensed in multiple countries. Attorneys like Jeff Childers and Warner are super nice enough guys, yet don't have that needed element. Consequently, they FEAR ending up like Peter McCullough with the [deep]state bar. It's a shame because Proverbs 1 says fear/revere [only] the Lord equals the 1st step towards wisdom while his thrown sits on justice and righteousness -psalm 89. šŸ§ āš–šŸ—½

https://patents.google.com/patent/US11107588B2/en

On balance, everyone meets their maker eventually and that's not a threat It's just real talk.

Expand full comment
Stevanovitch's avatar

Nobody’s getting outta here alive.

Expand full comment
Geoff Wexler's avatar

I'm somewhere between that and the 'm' messenger in mRNA is Messianic. Kind of need a savior when there's this level of controlled opposition <cough> <cough> Warner Bros Studio Ft Barn Esüm & Bailey Law (Circus joke for EweĀ²šŸ‘)

²b SlaughterĚd šŸ‘ šŸ‘ ¬

- The G.O.@¿🐐//]

Expand full comment
Eris's avatar

That patent is perfect evil for the prisoners of smart cities.

Expand full comment
Geoff Wexler's avatar

I follow most of them and it's one of the worst. To see something and say nothing = a neo (not seer). To see it and be a plaintiff lawyer, while dodging ones' constitutional rights and ethics = a situation of being disbarred and disowned by goĆød. Have mercy on your soul, hope the ultimate judge has enough "bandwidth" as far as grace.

GoĆød bless.

Expand full comment
Michael Hall's avatar

After seeing this anybody else think we might have let the Federal Government get just a little bit too large and powerfull?

Expand full comment
Grasshopper Kaplan's avatar

Harmacide scamdemic hacksxxxxine injextions are being advertised on kpfa news as I type.

Key reason is to reduce hospital visits and death , he says despite they don't work, wear a mask despite it don't help....

The fear has become the most powerful thing, fear and lies and killing

Expand full comment
Jill's avatar

I want to share something I posted to Renz and Balliwick here because I believe it could really help.

If we can find the jurisdiction willing to take your course of action, here is who I think would make the best prosecutor for it-- the jurisdiction needs to offer a job and protection to the prosecutor recently fired in the USVI for going after Chase Bank in connection w/jeff epstein. "On December 27th, a bombshell lawsuit was filed in Manhattan federal court against JP MorganChase, in which a federal prosecutor alleged that the country’s largest bank ā€œknowingly, negligently, and unlawfully provided and pulled the levers through which recruiters and victims were paid and was indispensable to the operation and concealment of the [Jeffrey] Epstein trafficking enterprise.ā€ https://dossier.substack.com/p/fired-epstein-targeting-ag-calls

Here is the strong, intelligent, courageous woman we have all been hoping for. There must be one jurisdiction which would welcome such a warrior. She is obviously willing to take on extraordinarily powerful people. We have been waiting for someone of her courage. Is there such a jurisdiction?

Expand full comment
Warner Mendenhall's avatar

I was aware of Denise George. Thanks for reminding me. I will reach out.

Expand full comment
Possum's avatar

The DoDgy dunnit.

Expand full comment
Dow Hurst's avatar

This may seem off topic, but it isn’t. Elliott Wave Theory describes how social mood dictates our actions. Learn more here: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/socionomics.asp A negative social mood is what brings on a bear market. What is on point here is that during a negative social mood crime is not as easy to commit without punishment. During times of positive social mood crime is often minimized or not punished. I think it is great there is another way to get at the perpetrators that wanted their population control mRNA platform. We may succeed in prosecuting them during the current bear market.

Expand full comment
Rogier van Vlissingen's avatar

isn't this exactly how they are suing the president in Switserland?

https://video.icic-net.com/w/doZzJePWtr7iEBDEDVb7hQ

Expand full comment
George Smith's avatar

Does the Act include the federal government as a person, or an agent or employee (person) in their official capacity? It is the government that is doing the vast majority of deceptive advertising under Public Service Advertising.

Expand full comment
DRK's avatar

Asking as one of the people, not an attorney... whenever an government official acts beyond the authority delegated to him/her/ (it?) by the people via Constitution, that person is acting in their private capacity, aren't they?

Even the nine justices are servants of the people. Or they are supposed to be.

Expand full comment
Beeswax's avatar

Would this give any teeth to malpractice cases against hospitals or administrative cases brought by doctors who lost their licenses over repurposed drugs? It seems like denying the effectiveness of repurposed drugs that have a much longer safety history and then these experimentals would fall under this section.

Expand full comment
Bridget's avatar

That’s the thing about mass Genocide programs; if you’re out to kill billions of innocent humans, you’re bound to slip up here and there.

Expand full comment